Chemtura (CHMT, $22.38, $2.1 Bn Mkt Cap, $2.5
Bn EV)
Idea source: Divestitures, PAH acquisition,
biggest recent daily drop.
Potential source of dislocation:
·
Event fatigue: CHMT had been a
“special-sit” for 3-4 years counting – topics include the emergence from
bankruptcy circa 2010-11, incentives to hit 2011 EBITDA guidance, and
continuous divestiture of non-core assets.
o
On
April 17th, CHMT announced the sale of its Agrochemicals business to
PAH for $1 Bn, or roughly 9.8x 2013 EBITDA. This price-tag is below the 11-12x
or $1.1-1.2 Bn most expect. The $200 mm difference (or ~$2 / share) is
immediately baked into the stock and pressures share downward amidst general
market weakness.
o
Post
this catalyst, there exists no obvious event path. Hence stock is in the limbo
of neither special-sits nor long-only value (given lack of bulge-bracket
coverage)
·
Train-wreck avoidance: Given the extreme
cold weather of El Dorado, Arkansas in Jan-Feb 2014 (often below 20F, where
Bromine’s freezing point is 12’ F), ~60% of CHMT’s Bromine capacity was
hindered (~15-20% of total sales post Ag divestiture) and will negatively
impact 1Q result. Funds may attempt to avoid exposure ahead of such.
·
Poor screen-test: Due to declining
top-line (divestitures), stagnant EBITDA margins (cyclical weakness in 1 of its
segments), and recently negative FCF (capacity expansion & divestiture), CHMT
may not screen well.
Company description: CHMT is a specialty
chemicals company that has 4 lines of businesses:
1.
Makes
additives into fuel (grease and chemicals that go into gasoline to make cars run
more efficiently and cleanly) and lubricants (like Lubrizol)
2.
Urethanes
(basically plastic that goes into golf balls, solid tires for heavy equipments,
etc),
3.
Bromine
& derivatives (flame retardants that go into foam insulates in buildings, circuit
boards, etc, also mercury control, and as drilling fluid), and
4.
Organometallics
(catalysts that help create more complex chemical compounds)
Thesis: 2:1 risk/reward w/ potential for
30-40% IRR, playing for sized (50% O/S) stock repurchase.
·
Upon
closure of Ag-segment sale by 2015YE, CHMT will obtain ~$850-900 mm in cash.
Along with (a) the ~$ 150-200 mm FCF it generates in FY14 and 15, (b) $549 mm
of cash, and (c) ~$900 mm of total debt, CHMT is set to have ~$650 mm net cash
position in 2015. With the management vocal about 2x net debt / EBITDA in
leverage, on $220 mm pro-forma EBITDA, CHMT
has roughly $1.1 Bn of firepower, or roughly 50% of market cap, to
return capital to shareholders. Management is very vocal about the subject and
will likely pursue the tender-offer path.
·
Assuming
the slump of Bromine continues (flat margin and top-line) and CHMT remains
around the current price ($22-23), management can repurchase ~9 mm, 31 mm, and
12 mm shares in 14, 15, and 16, effectively bringing EV down to ~$1.4 Bn and
market cap down to $1 Bn. In such a
scenario, CHMT is being valued at ~6.4x
FY2015 EV/EBITDA, below virtually all specialty chemicals comps (7.5 – 12
x) at arguably depressed earnings (12-13% EBITDA margin vs. 15-30% peers).
·
The
downside scenario we have is around $18.50 / share (5.5x our FY2015 EV/EBITDA).
Even during the down-turn circa 07-08, CHMT still manages to squeeze out 9-10%
EBITDA margin. While the mix is different now, it would take sizably lower
additive and lubricant demand (suggesting economic downturn) and another
cyclical hit to Bromine (all amidst the mercury policy lift, potential European
recovery, and O&G ramp in clear-brine fluids) to get us there. But in such
a case, the stock price will then be situated around CEO’s 1 mm option strike
zone ($15-$20) all with CHMT’s massive cash infusion. We believe the price may
also be tempting to many investors with ~10-11x 2014 P/FCF.
·
The
upside case is $30+ with multiple ways to win: (a) Oil additives &
Lubricants out-perform as transportation fires in all cylinders, (b) Bromine
pricing turns for various host of reasons, and CHMT drives towards 20% EBITDA
margin in this segment, (c) Announced stock-tender jump-starts immediate
upside, although time-line is uncertain.
·
Ultimately,
CHMT is a bit of a grinder-stock: we do not see any immediate catalyst that
makes the stock work, but it generates good free cash-flow, has an incentivized
CEO at the helm that cares about shareholders, and will receive a pile of cash
within the next 18 months. The current setup provides 2:1 risk-reward with
potential to 30-40%+ compounded returns over the next 2-3 years should every
box checks out. Barring another recession, the current 5-7% FCF yield can
easily bail an investor out over time.
Risk:
·
Bromine-based
flame-retardant could be in secular decline as major electronics manufacturers
phase out given toxicity – certainly, yet such dynamics (1) places premium and
barrier of entry on firms that have non-toxic products an (2) comfortably dissuades
new entrants. Additionally, if the rise of cloud computing takes hold, given
(a) the segregated nature of these clusters from consumers, (b) heightened risk
to a shut-down due to fire hazard, and (c) the favorable economics of bromide
products, the rise here should help offset consumer-driven slumps.
·
Continuously
weak Bromine price alongside weak traffic could cause downside volatility: see
chart below. Guangdong bulk Bromine pricing shows no sign of slowing down and,
while it is more commoditized than CHMT’s specialty derivatives, the decline
nonetheless causes my concern.
·
CHMT
was and continues to be a crowded idea – sell-side is all over this name w/
$30+ PTs and a lot of event-driven buyside firms know the name. 2 problems with
this point: (1) I am a generalist who only looked at this name for <1 week,
while the seller arguably knows the space and has been very involved. While the
conclusion of event may have led to event-funds forced selling, the feeling that
I have an informational disadvantage is incredibly strong. (2) With buy-back
further shrinking the size of the company, one may wonder who the last buyer to
print the blue-sky PT may be.
What will make me change my mind / reassess
thesis?
·
If
Bromine prices in Guangdong shows no sign of reversal – a far bigger problem
may be brewing in China alongside unbridled capacity add.
·
If
management changes tone about its capital-return plan and decides to hold it on
balance-sheet. In which case they may be preparing themselves for
winter/uncertainty.
·
If
the additive/lubricant side of the business shows strong signs of weakness –
meaning economic recovery is hitting a strong speed-bump.
·
If
a powerhouse comes up with a flame retardant that is superior in all spectrums.


1 comment:
Earnins not a train-wreck (or should we say Bromine is weak as expected). The hump is over and the stock should work from here on.
Post a Comment